And i also thought to your, you are aware I’m hoping you will never subscribe to one problem

Andrew Sharpless: – working with Bloomberg. And then I went away and I thought about a conversation I had had in Geneva with the Ambassador to the World Trade Organization, Mr. He listened to me very respectfully talk about how there were all kinds of measures of serious problems in the ocean.

Therefore turned into clear for me the different parts of the work actually work in tandem for a larger impression

And then he generally said… i’ve good mil members of China to pass through. The west might have been overfishing the brand new oceans for a long time. We shall score our very own change. And i also left feeling that we had very mishandled brand new appointment. Right here, I’d a contact that was that we may have even more eating out-of a wealthy ocean. I experienced totally failed to generate your keep in mind that end up in he heard myself providing the type of old-fashioned conservation message that’s a significant that but it’s simply just about biodiversity defense.

You to made me see, really, hold off one minute, we are able to level everything we are doing inside the a scientific metric which is the dining value of a remodeled sea, the food capital off reconstructed water. How many dishes could we feed out-of a remodeled ocean? I titled Bloomberg support and that i said, wait one minute, i’ve yet another suggestion. And you will why don’t we explore this eating, your food metric.

Melissa Wright: You were able to bring back that epiphany and help develop what’s now a 3-country effort around overfishing. And I saw this work in action and in a recent trip to Brazil and was so impressed and inspired. And Latin American Cupid-verifiering one of the side trips that we went on when I was in Brazil was to Itajai, and which I understand is one of the largest commercial fishing ports in Brazil.

Andrew Sharpless: They’re surprising big, aren’t they? I mean you – the audience should understand we’re not talking about like two guys in a little, you know, 15-foot skiff.

Melissa Wright: And Monica, the Brazilian rep from Oceana was telling me about how there was a lack of information, now, about what those boats are bringing in, which species, how much, when, and where they’ve been fishing because the country stopped monitoring their landings or their catch a few years ago. Can you speak to what impact that has had on the fisheries in Brazil and the work of Oceana?

Andrew Sharpless: So I’ve taken that same trip with you and it’s very impressive. The scale of our ability to catch ocean fish is enormous. And you see it as you go down that river and you’ll see these vessels that are stories and stories high – four or five or six stories high. So amazingly Brazil has collected no data on its own fisheries since 2008. Brazil’s had a kind of a budget crisis in that year. One of the ways they saved money was by cancelling all data collection efforts on fishery catches.

Wu

And thus working with, you understand, our couples indeed there the audience is now collecting landings study inside a keen formal and you may reliable way and you may reporting you to up. And they’re today get together analysis towards the about forty% of your overall fishery connect.

Andrew Sharpless: Yeah. Which is a pretty basic step, we can all see how that starts to set the conditions for, you know, scientific and sensible management. We’ve just launched together with this little enterprise called Google, and Sky Truth, an NGO, is our other partner. It’s called Global Fishing Watch. And your listeners can go to .