Specific Ashkenazi rabbis believed battering while the reasons for forcing a person supply a great Writ away from (religious) divorce case score

Meir’s responsa along with his copy out of a great responsum by R

Rabbi Meir b. Baruch out of Rothenburg (Maharam, c.1215–1293) writes you to “A great Jew must prize his partner more than the guy honors himself. If a person affects your wife, you should end up being punished so much more severely compared to striking another individual. For starters was enjoined so you’re able to prize a person’s wife it is maybe not enjoined so you’re able to prize one another. . If the the guy lasts within the striking their unique, the guy should be excommunicated, lashed, and you can suffer the brand new severest punishments, even to the the amount from amputating his case. If the their spouse is happy to undertake a divorce or separation, the guy need separation their unique and you may shell out their particular the newest ketubbah” (Even ha-Ezer #297). According to him you to definitely a woman who is hit from the their partner is entitled to an immediate breakup and have the currency owed their own in her relationship settlement. His guidance to chop from the give off a habitual beater out of their fellow echoes the law when you look at the Deut. –several, in which the unusual discipline out of cutting off a hands are used to help you a woman who attempts to conserve her partner in a way that shames new beater.

To help you justify their advice, R. Meir uses biblical and you may talmudic question to help you legitimize his opinions. After so it responsum the guy discusses the latest judge precedents for this decision from the Talmud (B. Gittin 88b). For this reason the guy finishes that “even in the truth in which she try happy to take on [periodic beatings], she do not undertake beatings instead a finish coming soon.” He what to the point that a hand provides the prospective to destroy which when the tranquility is impossible, the newest rabbis should try so you’re able to convince your so you can divorce or separation her out-of “his or her own 100 % free have a tendency to,” but if one proves impossible, force him so you’re able to separation and divorce her (as is invited by-law [ka-torah]).

This responsum is found in a collection of R. Simhah b. Samuel of Speyer (d. 1225–1230). By freely copying it in its entirety, it is clear that R. Meir endorses R. Simhah’s opinions. R. Simhah, using an aggadic approach, wrote that a man has to honor his wife more than himself and that is why his wife-and not his fellow man-should be his greater concern. R. Simhah stresses her status as wife rather than simply as another individual. His argument is that, like Eve, “the mother of all living” (Gen. 3:20), she was given for living, not for suffering. She trusts him and thus it is worse if he hits her than if he hits a stranger.

not, these people were overturned gerçek Venezüella kadın kalma by extremely rabbis into the afterwards years, beginning with Roentgen

R. Simhah lists all the possible sanctions. If these are of no avail, he takes the daring leap and not only allows a compelled divorce but allows one that is forced on the husband by gentile authorities. It is rare that rabbis tolerate forcing a man to divorce his wife and it is even rarer that they suggested that the non-Jewish community adjudicate their internal affairs. He is one of the few rabbis who authorized a compelled divorce as a sanction. Many Ashkenazi rabbis quote his opinions with approval. Israel b. Petahiah Isserlein (1390–1460) and R. David b. Solomon Ibn Abi Zimra (Radbaz, 1479–1573). In his responsum, Radbaz wrote that Simhah “exaggerated on the measures to be taken when writing that [the wifebeater] should be forced by non-Jews (akum) to divorce his wife . because [if she remarries] this could result in the offspring [of the illegal marriage, according to Radbaz] being declared illegitimate ( Lit. « bastard. » Offspring of a relationship forbidden in the Torah, e.g., between a married woman and a man other than her husband or by incest. mamzer )” (part 4, 157).